Appearance
Operating Systems
Terminal support by platform, with measured scores separated from availability and parser-only evidence
Terminals are not just protocol parsers. The OS windowing stack, font rendering, clipboard, input model, and pseudo-terminal layer all affect whether a feature works end-to-end. These pages show which terminals are available per platform, where terminfo.dev has platform-specific app probes, and where current scores are parser or reference evidence instead.
macOSapp-probed
Ghostty, iTerm2, Terminal.app, Kitty, Warp, VS Code, Cursor, and related parser backends.
Linuxgaps tracked
Ghostty, Kitty, Warp, Alacritty, WezTerm, editor terminals, Unix multiplexers, plus foot and GNOME Terminal gaps.
WindowsConPTY-aware
Windows terminal apps, editor-integrated terminals, cross-platform terminals, and the ConPTY platform layer.
Evidence Levels
| Evidence | Meaning |
|---|---|
| App probe on this OS | Full terminal app was launched and probed on that platform. |
| Parser probe | Reusable terminal parser/state machine was tested without GUI rendering. |
| Inherited engine | Page reuses an engine-equivalent score from another tracked terminal. |
| Reference app probe | App was probed on a different OS; useful signal, not platform-specific proof. |
| Not probed | The terminal or platform layer is tracked as a coverage gap. |